Once again, I find myself with a stack of "hits" I've amassed over time. I'm sure that these cards will be much happier in another collection than mine. So, I'm offering them up for trade. All I ask in return is a similar card featuring a Red Sox player. It shouldn't be hard to work something out. So, have a look at what I have.
If you see something you like, leave a comment saying so. That way, everyone knows you're after that card. Then, send me an e-mail (section36 at gmail dotcom) telling me the card you want, and what you're offering.
Let's make some trades!
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Why Do I Do What I Do?
Fuji has asked us all to answer a simple question.
How did you first decide to collect sports cards, and when?
I'll ignore the obvious flaw in the question, where it assume that collecting sportscards is a choice. It assumes it's not a calling from a higher power, or something I was destined to do. But, assuming it was a choice, where did I make it?
I was probably eleven, when I was at a friends house. He was a comic book collector. Had them in plastic sleeves, and everything. I didn't understand it, but whatever. He asked me if I wanted to go o the comic book store with him. Why not? So, I tagged along. While we were there, I noticed a flyer on the counter. The shop was looking to buy baseball cards. Huh. I had some of those at home. My dad would get me some packs here and there when he went to the store. So, I brought the flyer home, and looked it over. As it turned out, I had one of the cards on the list! A 1985 Topps Dwight Gooden. The store was offering $3.50 for one! I convinced my mom to bring me back to the store. I handed the card to the woman behind the counter. She looked the card over. She started talking to me about thinks like condition, and mint. My card, she'd only offer me $3. Deal!
Now, before you assume I started collecting because I was money hungry at 11, that's not exactly the case. It was more the realization that collecting cards was a "thing." I had been getting cards here and there for years, so I had a bunch of cards. I also had a bunch of Masters of the Universe action figures. But, they weren't a "collection." Baseball cards were something different. The could be collected. Bought, sold, organized, traded. I never traded my matchbox cars. They weren't a collection. baseball cards had a life of their own. That was pretty cool.
And it still is.
How did you first decide to collect sports cards, and when?
I'll ignore the obvious flaw in the question, where it assume that collecting sportscards is a choice. It assumes it's not a calling from a higher power, or something I was destined to do. But, assuming it was a choice, where did I make it?
I was probably eleven, when I was at a friends house. He was a comic book collector. Had them in plastic sleeves, and everything. I didn't understand it, but whatever. He asked me if I wanted to go o the comic book store with him. Why not? So, I tagged along. While we were there, I noticed a flyer on the counter. The shop was looking to buy baseball cards. Huh. I had some of those at home. My dad would get me some packs here and there when he went to the store. So, I brought the flyer home, and looked it over. As it turned out, I had one of the cards on the list! A 1985 Topps Dwight Gooden. The store was offering $3.50 for one! I convinced my mom to bring me back to the store. I handed the card to the woman behind the counter. She looked the card over. She started talking to me about thinks like condition, and mint. My card, she'd only offer me $3. Deal!
Now, before you assume I started collecting because I was money hungry at 11, that's not exactly the case. It was more the realization that collecting cards was a "thing." I had been getting cards here and there for years, so I had a bunch of cards. I also had a bunch of Masters of the Universe action figures. But, they weren't a "collection." Baseball cards were something different. The could be collected. Bought, sold, organized, traded. I never traded my matchbox cars. They weren't a collection. baseball cards had a life of their own. That was pretty cool.
And it still is.
Friday, July 27, 2012
Do Olympic Cards Belong in a Team Collection?
With the London Olympics starting up, it reminded me of an
important question. Do I put cards of players shown as members of Team USA in my Red Sox collection?
This wouldn’t be a
big deal were it not for two players. Nomar Garciaparra and Jason Varitek. They
are both major Red Sox stars. If you made an all-time Red Sox team, they would
both be on it…probably as starters. They both started their careers with the
Sox. Nomar was drafted by the Sox. Varitek made his ML debut with Boston, and
never wore another uniform. I’m not talking about Tino Martinez in a Cardinals
collection. These are Red Sox players. Unquestionable.
But, not on their
rookie cards. Ordinarily, that would be an obvious reason for exclusion. I
don’t have any David Ortiz rookie cards in my Red Sox binders. (Or anywhere
else in my collection, for that matter.) He’s not a Red Sox player on his
rookies. Bleh. That’s clearer though. There’s he is on his card looking at me
from his Twins uniform. It just shouts out at you as being wrong.
Varitek and Nomar
are different. It’s not a card of another Major League team. Is it more similar
to a minor league team? I have Nomar minor league cards in my Red Sox
collection. Of course, they were Red Sox minor league affiliates. So, they were
clearly Red Sox Organization cards. Not quite the same.
It’s probably closer
to a college card. Since both of them were at Georgia Tech at the time, that’s
the team they were on. Would I put other college cards on my Red Sox
collection? I have. I grabbed a Mo Vaughn card from his Cape Cod League days,
and it resides in my Red Sox binder. Although, that’s really a remnant from a
Mo Vaughn player collection that has since dissolved. The card was too neat not
to hold onto. But, it does give me a precedent…sort of.
So, what’s the
standard practice? Do Olympic cards make it into a team collection? Does the
player matter? Does the timing of the Olympic appearance matter? Does anything
else?
Can I have a 1992
Topps Red Sox collection without two all-time greats?
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
For Love of the Farm System
Heard a couple interesting things lately as potential
deadline deals have been tossed about. Most of them have ranged from silly, to
flat out wrong. Thankfully, I have this place here to make a plea for sanity.
Someone actually said that, “the best way to build a team is
through homegrown talent.” That is, of course, absolute bunk. The cheapest way
to build a team is through homegrown talent. The best way to build a team is to
have the best player at every position using any method you can to get them. If
the best way to build a team were using homegrown players, nobody would make a
trade. Ever. Now, I’ll admit. If you made up a team of active players that the
Sox drafted, it wouldn’t be a horrible team. But, it wouldn’t be as good as the
one they have now. (That might be a fun little exercise.) I’ll also admit that
this isn’t a perfect world, with endless pockets. So, in this world you do need
to consider having some cheaper younger players. But, you can’t say that it
gets you the best team.
Along those same lines, someone mentioned, “the farm system
is just getting respectable. Now’s not the time to start trading them away.”
Why not? Really, the farm system is designed to do one thing. Provide you with
players for the major league club. It can do that by having players you can
call up to the bigs. Or, it can provide you with players to trade for someone
who you can play in the bigs. Either way helps the team out. Really, the
comment should have been, “the farm system is respectable again, so they can
afford to trade some pieces away.” Make those chips work for you.
This love of the farms came up one more time when someone
was discussing the Sox and their playoff chances. The Sox should stand pat at
the deadline, the theory went, because if you trade away a prospect, you may
lose the wild card game. Then, you will have traded away the prospect for
nothing. I suppose that’s true. It’s also a horrible way to run a ball club.
Fear should never be a motivator. Just be smart about it. Yes, trading away
your three best prospects for some bench strength might not make sense. But, if
you can improve your club without being crazy, you need to do it.
People need to stop
falling in love with the future.
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
You Have to Give Cashman Credit
Most people, if they got completely fleeced by a team in a
trade would be reluctant to deal with that team for a while. Maybe try some
other teams. But, not Cashman. When he realized that he needed a washed-up
former all-star, he got right back on the phone to Seattle. I bet he didn’t
even wonder if the erosion of Ichiro’s skills was due to an injury of some
sort, as opposed to simple old age. That takes some guts. Kudos.
The Yankees move prompted a Yankees fan to ask me today when
the Red Sox would sell. I’m not really sure what he meant.
To me, the term “sell” or “seller” refers to the team that
parts with a star player for prospects. The idea being that the team isn’t
going anywhere with the star, so it’s better to cash him in and try again
another year. The “buyer” is the team that tosses prospects to another team for
its star to win now. When the Expos traded Pedro Martinez to the Sox for two
prospects, they were the seller.
Frankly, the Sox
don’t seem to fit either of those terms. Are they going to trade away any of
their stars for prospects? I can’t imagine who. Are they trading away prospects
to land a star? Maybe. Are they more likely to trade some middling guy for
another middling guy? Probably. Let’s look at this logically.
Barring some major
blockbuster, Salty, Gonzalez, Pedroia, and Middlebrooks are staying right where
they are. They’re too good. Gonzalez may be expensive, but he’s worth it. You
might see Ellsbury moving if the Sox wanted to get something before Boras asked
for $300 million. But, who would rent a player coming off a half-season injury?
He’s better than anything the Sox would get for him. Same goes for Crawford.
Even if you foolishly wanted to trade him, he’s better than anything you’d get.
That leaves you with Ross, Sweeney, and Aviles from the list of starters that
could move. Personally, I think they should move Ross, since they can get the
most for him. He may be the most valuable chip they have from the starting
line-up that might be available. Would moving Ross constitute a “sell?” Not to
me. But, if you want to, I guess that’s up to you.
What about the
pitchers? You’re not getting anything for Lester or Beckett that’s any better
than what you have. Unless you go for the old “change of scenery” idea and swap
Beckett for another guy who is his equal, and just hope they remember how to
pitch in Boston. Doesn’t seem like all that useful of an idea to me. Really,
there’s nothing there either. I guess this is a long way of saying I don’t
expect much to happen at the deadline.
I think I’m OK with
that.
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Red Sox 1-36: 11 is for…
11 runs scored by Sox in game 1 of 2004 World Series
And they needed just about all of them. What an amazing
game.
Really, you can expect a World Series game to be tense. You
can even expect it to be back and forth. After all, in theory, these are the
best pitchers and best hitters in the game. They should be able to have quite a
battle. What you don’t expect is to start things off with an 11-9 game.
The Sox were able to score a lot of those runs right away. A
four-run bottom of the first gave everyone in the stands something to cheer
about. They got four more over their last two innings. That’s spreading out the
fun.
The crazy part is that was most of the scoring for the rest
of the series. The Sox won game 1 11-9. They won games 2-4 by a combined 13-3.
Were those the most important eleven runs in Red Sox
history? Maybe. Maybe not. But, they certainly helped bring that first World
Series victory of the century. That makes those eleven runs pretty important in
my book.
11 is for eleven runs scored by the Sox in Game 1 of the
2004 World Series
Friday, July 20, 2012
Why Does Wally Sit in a NY Chair?
I was contacted yesterday by someone who had just made a
startling realization. She was watching the NESN broadcast of the game, and saw
a shot of Wally resting comfortably in his custom Adirondack chair. An
Adirondack chair? Those are from NY. How could that be? I looked it up, and
Wikipedia agrees with her. Adirondack chairs originated in NY. (Not NYC, but
still.) Has there ever been an explanation given as to why Wally would conduct
such a treasonous act? I don’t watch many games on NESN, so I can’t be sure.
Why can’t he watch games, instead, from a comfortable Boston rocker? We need
answers!
Quite a game last night. I was so worried that the Sox were
gong to waste a spectacular performance from Clay Buchholz. Just when the Sox
needed a strong outing from a starting pitcher, they got one. It would have
been a shame if they lost the game 1-0 anyway. It’s actually too bad that Buchh
got the no-decision. It means the EEIdiots can still look at a sub par record
for the starting rotation. “The Red Sox may be such and such after the break,
but their starters are…” I’ll certainly take the win though. Look at that ninth
inning. Hits by Crawford and Gonzalez to get the winning run on base. They
deserve some credit for doing what needed to be done in an important spot. And,
of course, Ross did all he needed, and more. What a tear he’s on at the moment.
With Papi down, extra power needed to come from somewhere. Ross obviously got
the memo.
I still chuckle at the idea of Pedro Ciriaco as the
designated hitter.
Toronto comes in, sans Jose Bautista. Shouldn’t have much
trouble finishing this homestand off strong on their way out to Texas. It would
be nice to have some momentum going before heading off.
It’s sure a lot of
fun.
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Why Isn’t Crawford in the Rotation?
Carl Crawford played his first games of the season this
week. He has looked fantastic in those games. I know my fantasy team had gotten
a huge boost from his return. (And Ellsbury’s too.) He’s doing everything Red
Sox fans hoped he’d do when he was signed. He’s doing it from the number two
spot in the order too. Some people, including Crawford, think that spot in the
order might have something to do with it. That had drawn the ire of some fans.
It shouldn’t matter where he’s batting. We’re giving this
guy 100 million dollars! He should bat wherever Valentine wants him to, and
just hit. If he’s in the seven spot, he needs to suck it up and perform. His
only job is to help the team. But, there are a few flaws with that argument.
The first one is that it always stops too soon. If the theory is that we’re
paying him 100 million dollars so he should hit wherever we put him, why does
that theory end with the batting order. What if Valentine said, “We’re paying
this guy 100 million dollars. We seem to have a lot of outfielders on the team
at the moment. But, Lester’s been struggling. So we need to have Crawford
pitch. I know he’s never done that before. But, like I said, he’s making 100
million dollars. He’ll just have to suck it up and throw that curve ball.” That
would be ludicrous. Why is it any different to force him to bat in a spot he’s
not used to?
Come on, you say, we’re just talking about a line-up shift
here. He should be able to deal with that. Well, if a player should just
produce no matter where they bat, why does it matter where you put Crawford?
Why does it matter where you put Pedroia? Why not hit Crawford second and
Pedroia sixth? If it doesn’t matter, why does it matter so much?
The real answer should be, “We’re paying Crawford 100
million dollars. Why are we asking him to do something different than what he
did to earn that 100 million?” If the Lakers get Dwight Howard, are they going
to make him play point guard? Of course not. They’re trying to get him because
he’s an elite center. When a company hires a new CEO, do they put him on the
line in the cafeteria? That would be crazy. They’re paying him millions because
he has elite skills to run a company. Not make creamed corn. Nobody’s telling
him, “For all that money, you’ll work wherever we tell you to.” They hired a
guy with a specific set of skills, so they put him in the position that uses
those skills.
It’s the same thing with Crawford. The Red Sox chased after
him because he was an elite talent. He could set the table at the top of the
order. He could drive pitchers crazy. He made it easier for everyone else
hitting behind him. He made the team better from that two-spot.
Why would you put him anywhere else?
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Sox Everywhere!
There was so much good to see from last night’s game, I’m
going to ignore the downer of David Ortiz’s ankle issues. There was just too
much positive.
Was there anything better than seeing Ellsbury-Crawford
leading things off for the Sox? There was such a sense of relief that came
along with it. The long wait is over. I had grown tired of sitting back waiting
for the real team to finally show up. I was tired of treating the first half of
the season like spring training. I was ready to really see what this team had.
It looks like the team is ready to start kicking some butt. No more treading
water waiting for reinforcements. No more hoping the AAA outfield can piece
together enough hits to keep the team afloat. The cavalry had finally arrived,
and the team can get back to winning. Phew.
Aaron Cook pitched a
great game as well. I would prefer that it was Lester or Beckett pitching a
gem. But, I’m not going to get picky. Cook has turned in a couple of fine
outings this season. He’s going to make trimming the rotation down to five guys
a little bit of a tougher decision. Honestly, I don’t have a problem sticking
with the six-man rotation for a couple weeks. Maybe they can use one of the
guys at the back end to add another piece by then. Until then, I’ll happily
accept any contribution like last night.
It was fantastic to
see the Gonzalez home run too. I’m not declaring him “back” or anything like
that. But, he’s been hitting pretty well in his last 25 games or so. If he’s
going to start driving balls the other way with authority, that’s definitely a
good turn of events. Having it be a late, important home run is great for the
team too. I never bought into the idea that Gonzalez isn’t a clutch player.
He’s had plenty of key hits for me to erase those doubts. But, it’s nice for
the team to know that a close game can turn into a victory. It really is as
easy as keeping it close until the bats figure it out. They won’t waste every
opportunity. This team is capable of scoring runs when they need them. It’s
always nice to be reminded of that.
This is a big week
for the Sox. This is the easiest stretch of games they’ll have for a while. It
would be nice to stockpile some victories before facing Texas, New York, and
Detroit.
A 3-1 second half is
a great start.
Monday, July 16, 2012
Extra Innings, By Bruce E. Spitzer
The year is 2092. The science of cryonics has finally
progressed to the point where they’re ready to bring someone back from the
dead. Who should they choose to bring back? How about the greatest hitter that
ever lived? What will be different the second time around for Ted Williams? How
will he adjust? Will he make the same choices he made in his first life, or
will he use this time to right any wrongs? What would any of us do in a similar
situation? Extra Innings deals with these questions and more as a
futuristic world welcomes a legend.
This was a wonderful book that I was lucky enough to have
provided to me for review. I was a bit nervous when I started, because I don’t
consider myself a science fiction fan. That wasn’t a problem at all. While set
in the future, it didn’t seem to scream sci-fi to me. In fact, this book didn’t
scream any particular genre to me, which is part of the appeal. Sure, it was a
book about a baseball player, but it wasn’t exactly a sports novel. It dealt
with philosophical issues, but wasn’t an inspirational book. It simply wound it
all into a single story. I found myself asking what I would do each time
Williams made a decision. Could I have done it? The story was easy to follow,
and believable. Well, as believable as a story about someone being brought back
to life 90 years after they died can be. I could imagine that this story would
be exactly how it would happen if we ever get to that point. A person in that
situation would have to deal with a new lifestyle, with all the changes that a
new century required. They would face the inner struggle between the former,
familiar, life and the opportunities for change presented by the new one. Would
old values still apply in a new body? It made for a book I had trouble putting
down, and suggest you pick up for yourself.
Rating: 3 bases
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Music in the Park
In addition to a baseball game, fans that flock to Fenway
Park are also treated to a musical concert along the way. Back in the day, this
was in the form of organ music. The new high-tech sound systems these days
blare modern classics in all their glory. When done right, it certainly
enhances the ballpark experience. I was able to attend a game this weekend at
Fenway and noticed that, for the most part, they did it right.
The most obvious musical addition to the game is also one of
my biggest pet peeves. The National Anthem. It always amazes me. I would think
that if I were asked to sing in front of such a large crowd, I’d make an effort
to get a copy of the words and music for the song. Most National Anthem singers
seem to ignore the second part of it. They get a copy of the lyrics, but decide
to make up the tune as they go along. Bugs me every time. It’s the National
Anthem, not a song you’re covering. It’s not your chance to create your own
version of “Yesterday.” It’s honoring the country, not your singing. When it’s
done simply by instruments it’s usually over in a minute or two. Why do singers
feel the need to drag it out and mix it up? Just sing the song like it is
supposed to be sung.
Another spot that there’s always music is when a player is
coming to the plate. His “walk-up” music. I have no idea when this custom
started. I assume it’s one of those things that evolved over time. They must
have needed music to play during that time, so the music guy picked some songs.
As it went along, they realized it would be fun to assign clever songs to some
players. Eventually, it became a standard where the players would select their
songs. Some of them can be quite a hoot. We all got a kick out of Nick Punto
being introduced to the Baha Men’s “Who Let the Dog’s Out?” Is he implying that
he lets the dogs out? Seriously? The back-up second baseman? Maybe if David
Ortiz wanted to use that song it would be one thing. But, Nick Punto? Maybe
he’s actually wondering, “Who let those dogs out? I know I sure didn’t.” The
other walk-up song that stood out to me this weekend was Jarrod
Saltalamacchia’s use of Falco’s “Rock Me Amadeus.” Is that a long-time
favorite? Did he just want something that was instantly recognizable? What
about new players? How do they pick their music? When the Sox called up Pedro
Ciriaco, when did he submit his musical selection? Does he have to submit a
number and song request when he gets on the bus from the minors? Does the team
pick it for the first few games? Is it something he’s always known he wanted?
When a high-schooler is dreaming of making the bigs, is he already playing his
walk-up music in his head? Does he have the song in mind the second he steps
into a big-league clubhouse? I wonder what my walk-up music would be.
They also play music during pitching changes. That’s another
time that I don’t mind music. If the songs can be a little clever, all the more
power to them. This weekend, Blondie’s “One Way or Another” was used during one
of the exchanges. It was a nice tune, and didn’t seem forced. It even acts as a
clever taunt. That’s always appreciated. The pitching change is a nice time,
because there’s actually time to play the entire song. Sometimes they try to
squeeze it in during a mound visit. That just sounds like filler, and I don’t
like it. That’s closer to playing a “breaking glass” sound effect when a foul
ball goes into the stands. It’s just noise. But, a full song is just fine.
Although, I do wish they’d break out “Fool on the Hill” more often.
Another big music time during the game? Obviously the
seventh inning and “Take Me Out to the Ballgame.” Clearly, I have no problem
with that classic. I love the fact that they play the organ as background
instead of celebrity covers. Actually, I do have one small problem with the
song. They only sing the chorus. There’s plenty of time during the stretch to
play the verses as well. They already put the words on the scoreboard, so why
not add the rest? Why not teach us all about Katie Casey, and her young beau? A
classic ballpark like Fenway should play the entire classic song. Maybe then
people would stop asking “Why do we sing ‘Take me out to the ballgame’ when
we’re already here?”
Of course, in Fenway, there’s another traditional baseball
song sung an inning later. Neil Diamond’s “Sweet Caroline” had become a modern
classic in the middle of the eighth inning. Some people have a problem with the
song, but I don’t. I don’t mind, because it evolved naturally. It’s not like
some publicist decided to make something out of it, started playing it and put
the lyrics on the scoreboard. It’s not like it was forced down our throats like
“Tessie” by the Dropkick Murphys was. They simply played the song, and people
enjoyed it. That’s exactly how traditions are supposed to start. I don’t care
that people sing along when the Sox are losing either. What are you supposed to
do, sit in silence every second the Sox aren’t ahead? I don’t mind trying to
have a little fun.
Really, there are
few moments during the game that doesn’t have background music to it. It makes
the down times float by a little faster.
Which is always
appreciated.
Friday, July 13, 2012
It Is Time
Here we sit, ready to start the unofficial second half of
the season. What can we expect from our beloved Sox in the months ahead? I
can’t wait to find out.
Can you believe I actually heard one of the EEIdiots say
that we already know what we’re going to get? He had the gall to say that
they’ve been a .500 team all season, so that’s what we should expect. After
all, half a season is a legitimate sample size, so this team is what it is at
this point. Huh? What team is what it is? The team that’s been on the field for
the last couple months? Maybe I’ll concede that that team has had time to see
exactly what it is by now. But, even that’s a stretch. After all, there are a
couple things that are going to be different about the second half. Namely the
number of all-stars on the field at any given time.
Sure, the Red Sox who start Kalish-Nava-Sweeney in the
outfield has had plenty of time to show exactly what they are. What about the
team with Crawford-Ellsbury-Ross on the grass? We haven’t seen that team on the
field yet. If the Red Sox of the first half are a .500 team, that new outfield
has to be worth a couple games. Right?
But, the offense has been fine, the EEIdiots claim. They
point out that the replacement outfielders haven’t been performing that poorly.
And, no, they haven’t been hitting .200 or anything. It’s the consistency.
Sure, the AAA outfield can hold their own, or even excel, against weaker
pitching. But, top of the rotation guys shut them down. The Red Sox of the
second half doesn’t get swept in Oakland.
What about the pitching? Nobody’s hurt on the pitching
staff! Well, except for the closer. He’ll be coming back. Anybody not think
bringing in an all-star closer will help a bullpen? Even if you have him set up
for a while? Oh, and the third starter. He was on the DL, and is now back.
Remember when he was pitching well before he left? Are we expecting a return of
his stomach issues? Shouldn’t we expect Clay to be Clay in the second half?
But, Beckett’s awful! He needs to be shipped off! Ahh, but he spent some time
on the DL in the first half too. Lumped together, his body of work in the first
half is less than stellar. But, he wasn’t John Lackey out there. He had a
couple terrible starts surrounding his DL stints. He’s had quite a few
fantastic outings. I don’t see why we should expect Beckett to continue to
struggle.
The Sox are a couple games out of the playoffs as the second
half starts. Sure, there are a lot of other teams bunched along with them. But,
are any of those other teams planning on adding three all-stars to the team?
I didn’t think so.
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
The Some Stars Game
The annual midsummer classic was held last night. I have
always liked seeing the All-Star game. It has been appointment TV for years.
Thankfully, however, I started that tradition before Joe Torre ruined the game.
I wonder if it would be the same if I didn’t start watching until now.
Really, the whole idea of playing everyone has to go. I hear
lots of complaints about why the game might be losing its appeal. One of the
excuses that I heard yesterday was that interleague play is a big problem. In
the old days, people would watch the game to see how an elite hitter from one
league would fare against an elite pitcher from the other. With interleague
play, I already saw how David Ortiz fared against Gio Gonzalez. That’s a valid
point, to an extent. The match-up is not something new. But, I contend that
it’s not the uniqueness of the match-up that makes the difference. It’s the
quality of the players. Just because I saw Pedro Martinez face Manny Ramirez a
dozen times doesn’t mean that it got boring. Adrian Gonzalez faces CC Sabathia
every couple days, it seems. I still am riveted by those match-ups. So, I still
want to see how David Ortiz would match up against Stephen Strasburg, even if
it weren’t the first time. You want to know what I don’t need to see? How Billy
Butler matches up against RA Dickey. Or how Melkey Cabrera does against anyone.
That has no interest in me. I would gladly watch the starting line-up face the
entire opposing pitching staff (except, I suppose, that guy starting at short
for the AL).
The other complaint is that there isn’t the same intensity.
It doesn’t mean anything to the players. Why would it? It clearly doesn’t mean
anything to the leagues. If the leagues really wanted to win, Josh Hamilton
would not have come out of the game. So, if the leagues think it’s just a
chance for 60 guys to get their picture on TV, why would the players think any
differently? Why the starters just can’t play nine innings is beyond me. If you
want to get clever and pinch-run for David Ortiz in the ninth with Mike Trout,
be my guest. That’s trying to win. Not trying to make Angels fans happy. And,
really, how happy are we making them? I got to see David Ortiz take, what, two
at-bats? I didn’t get a giddy feeling over that. So, why would MLB allow the
product to be diluted just so White Sox fans can see Paul Konerko for five
minutes? I’d rather have watched a great team for nine innings.
Wouldn’t you?
Sunday, July 8, 2012
A Clever Phillies Phan
I’ll admit that my latest contest placed some people at a
disadvantage. The contest asked you to take a picture of yourself in Section
36. Obviously, that task was much easier if you happened to be going to a game
at Fenway in June. Just snap a picture while you’re there. It also slightly
favored some fans who take a lot of pictures while they’re at game. Maybe in
your picture collection, you happened to have a shot of you in Section 36. But,
that only helps if your local ballpark has a Section 36. What if it doesn’t?
What if you’re a Phillies Phan? What if Citizens Bank Park
didn’t have the foresight to have a Section 36? What do you do in that case?
You need to get clever.
Enter Dawgbones, a Phillies Phan. He didn’t let a little think
like an inadequate ballpark stop him. Take a look at his entry.
That’s right. He took it upon himself to create a Section
36. In case you can’t read the sign on the wall, it states that “For the
entirety of June, this cubicle will henceforth be referred to as: SECTION 36
with all of the appurtenant responsibilities, entitlements, and accouterments!”
How wonderful is that? That’s the kind of creativity and
dedication I like to see. Unfortunately, despite all of that, Dawgbones did not
win the drawing for the prize. Here at Section 36, however, I can’t let that
kind of effort go unrewarded. When you think that far outside the box, and
overcome such an obvious obstacle, you deserve some recognition. So, I have
scoured Dawgbones’s wantlists, and he should be expecting a consolation package
of cards shortly.
So, thanks again to Dawgbones, and everyone else who entered
the contest. Stay tuned for another chance to win.
And, thanks for the creativity!
Friday, July 6, 2012
Pedroia Screws the Sox Once Again
So, instead of a healthy Dustin Pedroia coming off the DL in
time for the Yankees series, we have a stubborn Pedroia going on the DL in time
for the Yankees series. Not only that, but we had to suffer through him
clogging a roster spot as he gritted it out and acted tough while he performed
like garbage in the games he could play in. When is everyone else going to get
tired of Laser Show’s act?
Probably never, because the media loves the guy. I actually
heard a radio idiot wonder this afternoon if the Red Sox were looking past
Seattle to the weekend series with the Yanks. Was that the reason they got
swept? Was it another example of the poor character of this team? Was it lack
of focus? It certainly wasn’t because Pedroia was awful while he was playing,
and robbing Bobby Valentine of flexibility when he wasn’t. Did anyone see the
line-up the Sox had to use in the last game against Seattle? Would focus have
really helped?
On the first day of Jere’s Anti-Boston Media Weekend, I
think it’s telling that one of the biggest crimes of the media comes to the
forefront. The fact that things that make their jobs easier are examples of
good players. Who are some players that have been well liked in Boston?
Pedroia? Ortiz? Millar? What do they all have in common? They give the media
great quotes. Who are some players who have been constantly dogged? Dice-K? JD
Drew? Adrian Gonzalez? What do they all have in common? They’re dull.
What’s the biggest crime a player can commit after a poor
performance? Not “owning up to it.” Not talking to the media. Josh Beckett got
shelled…and then WASN’T AVAILABLE IN THE LOCKER ROOM! So, it’s a major
character flaw, apparently, if a player doesn’t make the media’s job easier?
What exactly does talking to the media prove? That you’re talkative. Other than
that? I can’t think of anything. Are you more sorry if you tell the Herald that
you played poorly? I’m fairly certain that every player dislikes playing poorly
whether they say it in print, or not.
So gritty (quotable) Pedroia will continue to get a free
pass. He had nothing to do with the horrible west coast trip. He was busting
his butt, after all. Not like that slacker Crawford who is waiting until he can
actually play before he plays. If only more players were like gutsy (quotable)
Pedroia, last September might not have happened. Despite his superior numbers
in every meaningful category, it was Adrian Gonzalez wilting (not giving
quotes) that killed the team down the stretch.
Drives me crazy.
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Happy (two hundred) Thirty-sixth!
Today we wish a very happy 236th birthday to the
United States of America!
Why do we call the fourth of July, America’s birthday? It’s
the day we declared our independence. Wouldn’t the birthday be when the
Constitution was ratified? In any event, Happy Fourth of July to everyone!
I’ve never been to Fenway for a July 4 game. It always
seemed like it would be a fun one to get to go to. I came close once. I had
tickets and everything. Was going to make a day of it. Game in the afternoon,
fireworks in the evening. Then the day came. It was hot. No, not hot. it was
HOT. You couldn’t turn on the TV without someone telling you to stay the heck
inside. If you even walked down the street, you ran the risk of bursting right
into flames. And I wanted to sit out in the sun for four hours at a game?
Suddenly didn’t seem like the smartest idea. So, I skipped the game. I know. I
feel terrible about it. But, really, at that point it’s a health issue, right?
I’ve been to Fenway on other Holidays. Opening Day. Patriots
Day. Easter. Mother’s Day. Memorial Day. Father’s Day. Labor Day. Just not
Independence Day. Yet.
Anyone been to Fenway for the Fourth of July?
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
A Banner Weekend
Jere, reigning Scavenger Hunt Champion and author of A RedSox Fan from Pinstripe Territory, has come up with a great plan.
Much like I am, Jere is tired of the local media. He’s tired
of them telling us how to think. He’s tired of them making up stories just to
create controversy. He’s just sick of it all. So, he proposes we do something
about it. An anti-media weekend at Fenway.
This weekend, the Yankees are in town for four games. As it
happens, these games will be covered by four networks (NESN, MLB, FOX, and
ESPN). So, Jere is proposing that people who go to Fenway this weekend bring
signs displaying our disgust with local Red Sox coverage. While the signs might
not get much play with NESN, the national networks might be able to have some
fun with it. I can imagine that ESPN might enjoy showing a sign on Sunday with
Tito in the booth that read “Beer and Chicken aren’t crimes!”
Obviously, a couple things to keep in mind if you’re
thinking of a sign. Be creative or clever, NOT profane. And, for the love of
Josh Beckett, don’t hold them up while the game is going on. Between innings
will be just fine to get the point across.
Naturally, if you’re at Fenway this weekend and take
pictures of these signs in or from Section 36, send them along so I can post
them here. (Along with any other pictures you take in Section 36, of course.)
Get those creative juices flowing.
Sunday, July 1, 2012
And the winner is…
Who is that man, shrouded in mystery? That is none other
than the winner of the June contest! So, a big round of applause for Steve who
won a copy of the spectacular book, The First Fall Classic. Steve has provided
this blog with several pictures in the past, so I was expecting a strong entry
from him. As you can see, he came through.
So, congratulations to Steve! If you see him, give him a
slap on the back for me. Thanks, as well, to everyone who sent in an entry.
I’ll be sharing the runner up photos with everyone along the way in the Pix
from 36 page. I’m sure you’ll agree that I had several wonderful pictures
entered.
For those that didn’t win, you’ll get another chance. Keep
your eyes open for your next opportunity to win.
Congratulations again Steve!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
What people are reading this week
-
1. Carl Yastrzemski 2. Mo Vaughn 3. Kevin Youkilis 4. Tony Perez 5. Cecil Cooper 6. Bill Buckner 7. George Scott 8. Jack Clark 9. Da...
-
I am so excited that Section 36 had another visitor! Jazmine Johnson is passionate about Helping First-Generation Low Income (FGLI) Colleg...
-
1. Wade Boggs 2. Kevin Youkilis 3. Rico Petrocelli 4. Mike Lowell 5. Carney Lansford 6. Bill Mueller 7. Scott Cooper 8. Butch Ho...
-
I’m not a “prospects” guy. I’m a proven talent sort of guy. I will trade prospects for proven talent any day of the week. In the right sort...
-
Can’t imagine getting more out of that road trip than what the Red Sox gave us. Winning both series would have been a best case scenario. T...