2003 Topps Heritage
Heritage is an interesting line of cards. It takes current
players, and puts them in designs from the past. When they first came out, the
idea of seeing today’s stars in the design of the classic 1952 Topps set was
pretty fantastic. It was a novel concept that really appealed to a lot of
people. But, now that we’re several years into the concept, is it really any
different than any other card design? Do I look at this card any differently
than some of the Fleer designs that mimicked classic design elements?
Do people buy this card because they like the design, or
because they like 1954 Topps?
Assuming my scanner knew what the edges of a card looked
like, this is a nice little card. Obviously the side of me that loves photos is
severely disappointed. But, the rest of it is there. Pedro’s name is written
nice and clearly on the top of the card, and I don’t need to turn my head to
read it. (I promise, it’s all there on the actual card.) It has a color team
logo…even if this one appears to be scratched somehow. I’ll have to go double
check the card itself at some point, because if the scratch is really there, I
missed it until now. It has Pedro position, and team name. The Topps Heritage
logo is nicely hidden in the corner, and even more obscured by being an opaque
watermark type of image. Wonderful.
I do like the artistic design of the card too. It’s
colorful, which is always a plus. Especially when it’s not colorful to the
point of distraction. I like the large head shot, with the smaller full body
post. It makes for a nice contrast in the images. I even like the facsimile
signature, even though it makes it distracting if you get the card autographed.
That’s actually too bad because otherwise, the bold green background would
present a signature very well.
It’s a nice design, and I enjoy it. But, do I enjoy it
because it’s a nice design? Or do I like it because it reminds me of 1954?
Or is it a little of both?
No comments:
Post a Comment