I wrote recently about the Sox bias against signing older
players to long term contracts, and whether that theory could work. My thought
was that it kind of just did. The Sox just won the World Series with a roster
almost completely empty of older players on long-term deals. They were almost
exclusively short-term vets, and players on their initial contracts. So, they
could be forgiven if they thought that it could work again.
But, is that what gave them the idea in the first place?
Last spring, I don’t remember any talk of limiting veteran
contracts as a rule. Sure, Drew was a short term deal. But, that was supposedly
so he wouldn’t block the way for Bogaerts/Iglesias this year. The same went for
the Victorino and Napoli standard three-year contracts. I didn’t hear anyone
suggest they were only signing them because that’s all they were signing
players to. They had young outfielders in the system that couldn’t be blocked.
Some of them might even end up at first base. We needed stopgaps. I heard a lot
of talk last spring about “bridge” contracts. I didn’t hear anything about a
new direction.
Then they went and won the World Series.
Did that change things from a bridge to a launching pad?
Did they sit back this winter and think to themselves,
“Lookie here. We have nobody on the team signed long-term, other than that
mistake we made with Pedroia. Why should we open ourselves up to any more
mistakes?” So, they sat down and looked over contracts, and decided that
youngsters and selected veterans could actually work. It could really be their
new plan.
Or, was that the plan all along? Did they sign their free
agents last year with all this in mind? Did they grumble about extending
Pedroia? Was he the exception they were willing to make? Did everything last
year go exactly as they thought it might?
If so, was winning it all last year a bad thing? (Or, as bad
a thing as being the defending World Champions can be.) Did it give them false
hope? Or false affirmation?
Or, was it the proof that what they wanted to do all along
was the right move?
It just didn’t work so well this year.
I think Crawford is what gave them the idea.
ReplyDelete