First he almost single-handedly ruined the All-Star game.
Now he helps come up with this dopey replay system. I don’t understand it.
Really, I have one main complaint with the proposed use of
replay.
Why does getting the call right have to be a managerial
tactic?
Why do we need to “challenge” a call in order to get it
reviewed? Why do we make the manager decide whether or not this is going to be
the worst call against him?
Teams get to challenge one play per game prior to the
seventh inning. So, let’s say it’s the bottom of the first with two outs, and
there’s a close play at first. It’s fairly clear that the batter was called out
when he should have been safe. Does the manager challenge? If he does, and is
wrong, he can’t challenge another call until the seventh inning. What if in the
third inning with the bases loaded and two outs, the ump completely blows the
call at first and robs them of a run? The manager better save his challenge in
case that happens. So, even with the ability to make the right call on that
play in the first, the wrong call will stand because the manager didn’t want to
risk it. Why would we still allow that to happen?
According to MLB, these reviews should take around a minute.
Can’t we decide most wrong calls long before that? If there’s a bad call in a
game, doesn’t the replay on TV expose it before the guy gets back to the
dugout? Why do we need to go through the process? A team’s going to have a guy
in the clubhouse, now, watching all the replays, right? And the manager isn’t
going to challenge unless his guy already knows he’ll win right? So, why have
the challenge system? Just have someone making the correct call right off the
bat. Just have the guy in NY watching the game and correcting the calls as he
sees them. Just buzz the ump, and say hold on…reverse that call. Aren’t we
looking at 10-20 seconds to get that done? In other words, well before the next
pitch is thrown? And, nobody is getting hosed because they already used their challenge,
or are saving their challenge. The correct calls are just being made. How is
that hard?
It’s also weird that there will be more challenges allowed
after the sixth inning than there are before the sixth. Do umps get sloppy as
the game progresses? Does MLB think a run in the third inning is less important
than a run in the eighth inning?
Not every play will be reviewable either. The rationale
given was that overturning something like a HBP could be too difficult when it
comes to reconstructing the inning. But, a manager is welcome to argue plays
that aren’t reviewable. (They can’t argue a reviewable play, other than issuing
a challenge.) So, an umpire can overturn a HBP because of a manager’s argument,
but not because of replay? Or is MLB admitting that there’s no way a manager
will change an umpire’s mind?
Obviously I’m thrilled that MLB is finally expanding replay.
I love the fact that more correct calls will be made. It’s possible that nobody
will ever need more than the one challenge. It could all work great.
But, why does it have to be so difficult?
No comments:
Post a Comment