Nobody. Zip. Zilch. Nada.
The BBWAA decided yesterday that nobody was worthy of
election to the Baseball Hall of Fame. For the first time in a long time, they
may have actually gotten it right. I didn’t do this before the election, so why
not do it now. How did I feel about the candidates?
For the sake of this part of the entry, let’s just pretend
we have never heard of the word PED. It’s just easier for now. We can break the
candidates into a few different categories.
The one and dones. Really can’t argue with not electing the
nineteen players who were taken off the ballot. They’re former major league
players. That’s just going to have to be good enough.
The before my times. There were five or six players on the
list who I wouldn’t have voted for…but would be willing to let someone who is
older than me say they really do deserve it. Those guys are Morris, Raines,
Smith, Trammell, Murphy, and maybe Mattingly. I wouldn’t give any of them my
vote. But, if someone who was big into baseball from 83-88 wants to tell me
that Tim Raines was a superstar just like Rickey Henderson, I’d defer to that
judgment.
The Hall-of-Very-Goods. There were ten of those. Nothing
wrong with being not quite good enough for the Hall of Fame. But, they’re not
quite legends. Rafael Palmeiro never entered any conversations I ever had
discussing the greatest players in the game. I never said, “Boy, you have to
see that guy Biggio play…what a talent!” Sosa’s great years were too short.
Mark McGwire was Dave Kingman with more power. McGriff and Bagwell were great
players…but is anyone mistaking them for Jimmy Foxx? Edgar Martinez was a
great, consistent hitter. But, other than being the best DH, does he find
himself atop any lists? Piazza too. Can you go into the Hall as a great hitting
catcher, if you can’t catch? What if David Ortiz played shortstop? If he made
35 errors every year and had range almost as bad as Jeter. But, he hit 50 home
runs. Does that make him a Hall-of-Fame shortstop? If I ever heard anyone refer
to Piazza as a “great hitter” instead of a “great hitting catcher” it would be
different. If Carlos Delgado stayed behind the plate, does that make him a
legend? And, sorry Curt Schilling. Thanks for 2004. And 2007. But, when
Schilling was on the mound I thought to myself that the Sox had a good chance
to win the game. When Pedro was on the mound, I thought to myself that the Sox
already had the game won. That’s the difference.
Legends. That leaves Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens. The only
two players on the ballot who would get my vote if PED wasn’t a word.
But, PED is a word. So, what does that do to Clemens and
Bonds? Well, I can certainly see punishing them by not voting for them the
first year. I probably would have made them wait too. Would I ever vote for
them? I’m going to take my cue from Mark McGwire. I’m not here to talk about
the future.
I’m just here to say the writers got it right.
This was one of the best pieces I have read on the subject and not just because I agree with you.
ReplyDeleteMorris and Raines would be my borderline guys. I would not be angry if they got in, but I don't care that they did not.
Great point on Piazza.
Great point on Schilling, although I said it about Blyleven.
I want my HOF to be unquestionably the best of the best. I don't want stat compilers (Lee Smith). I don't want shortened careers unless they were truly dominant (Mattingly).
There is nothing wrong with just falling short. Harold Baines, Dwight Evans and others had great careers, just not HOF.
Sorry for rambling. Great piece!
Good points. I know Pedro is a HOFer. I think Schilling will be, too. Pedro: 219 wins, 2.93 ERA, 2-20 win seasons, 0.687 winning percentage, 3154 Ks, 19 seasons. Schill: 216 wins, 3.46 ERA, 3-20 win seasons, 0.597 winning percentage, 3116 Ks, 20 seasons and huge playoffs and W.S. Performances. Pedro was truly dominant for several seasons and Schilling was usually outstanding In the playoffs. In the end, closer than one would think. Pedro will get inducted in less tries but I think Schilling will join him someday.
ReplyDeleteI really thought that Schilling's best shot at getting in would be this year. If voters were looking for a clean vote, they might toss one his way. the next couple years have pitchers better than him, so it should be tougher.
ReplyDeleteI can't get past the fact that he never dominated. He was a dang good pitcher. He was just missing that next level.