2004 Topps AL Strikeout Leaders
First off, I have no idea what my scanner thinks. I understand if it doesn’t know where the white border of a card begins or ends. But, why it can’t at least follow the little red line is beyond me. Rest assured, in real life the card has a bottom.
First off, I have no idea what my scanner thinks. I understand if it doesn’t know where the white border of a card begins or ends. But, why it can’t at least follow the little red line is beyond me. Rest assured, in real life the card has a bottom.
I don’t know why, by I always seem to forget how good Pedro
was after 2002. I don’t know why my mind mentally keeps ending his greatness
with that should-have-been Cy Young year. That’s why it’s nice for me to see
cards like this one reminding me that he was still pretty darn good in 2003. In
fact, he finished second in the league in strikeouts. Not bad at all. Maybe
it’s the fact that he didn’t lead the league by 50% that has me discounting his
season. Much like I have a hard time treating Jon Lester like an ace because he
isn’t Pedro, maybe I do the same thing to Pedro himself.
Anyway. About the card.
Yeah. There’s not much special here. I find myself wondering
what I expect from league leader cards. There’s really only so many ways you
can get three guys on once card and make it interesting. Unless you happen to
have all three guys in one pic. I do wish they had put the strikeout totals on
the front of the card. I think that’s pretty important when you’re talking
about league leaders. I’m also not sure why the AL logo needed to be bigger
than Pedro’s head. Maybe, instead of an enormous logo, they should put the
picture of the all-time leader in the category? That might make the cards more
interesting. Then we could see how Loaiza’s total matched up to Ryan. Or, maybe
the active leader. Would also be a way for Topps to get another star onto the
card.
But, that’s really all I have. It’s a card that serves its
purpose, and works under the constraints it has.
Would have been better if Pedro were on the top.
No comments:
Post a Comment